Retaining the (circa) 50c SP valuation was both predictable and nice.
What I did notice in the valuation was a LOW well cost of $3m compared to the bakken well cost of $5m. Is this all to do with depth? Does it also hint of the involvement of a "low cost" large JV player?
cheers
Ann: Enercom Conference and Presentation , page-3
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 10 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)