@oldgold64 ....Your link doesn't work at all, so I'll try here
Hopefully that works...
Even though he is excited, and mainly concentrates on the July announcement at Green, he does later cover the September announcement, but doesn't say much about all the dud holes that are shown there and the patchiness of the great results.
These September results do have infill between those great July assays, and even though the headlines show some great assays, overall it's a bit disappointing compared to what the market was expecting..
This is clearly seen by the SP opening at 58c that day and falling ever since to the current 33c.
The drill lines at Green are now 200m apart from the AC drilling, with RC now being drilled and a statement in the last announcement about how the XRF results went deeper than the AC drilling, but no details about where those holes were or how deep.
Looking at the results in detail clearly showed how great mineralisation in hole EAL515 quickly dissipated as hole EAL516 was only 66M South, yet the 72M at 1%, with a high grade portion of 18M at 2.7% Nb2O5, had gone to 61M at 0.9 with 4M at 2.1% Nb2O5 and a separate 2M at 2.4%. Further South the next hole EAL517 also only had a high grade portion of 6M at 2.2% Nb2O5 with 50M of 0.6%.
These 3 holes were the most consistent, yet the high grade went from 18M down to only 6M in width. The holes 200M East and West didn't match with any continuity of high grade at all!!
As I've previously stated, I don't think the market is adding any value to the low grade mineralisation in this area at all, as only the higher grade will be mined over the next couple of decades, with Luni having over 50M tonnes of over 2% mineralisation, and this will probably be upgraded with the updated MRE due next year.
BTW, why do you always have to include this type of statement .... "
Stop listening to paid institutional STOOGES, traders and short sellers on this forum , obviously trying to cheat investors and long term holders."
There have been no posts here for the last week, so what on earth are you going on about?? Plus as a former holder that sold on the under expectation results, I've been far more accurate on where this stock is headed than you have, by a long way.
I'll keep looking at the results and mapping them, for my own interest, and if they prove to be really good when the next assays come in then I'll probably be a buyer, but I base my interpretations on actual results, not a belief in what I want it to be.
Remember the results for Green on 16th Sept were for something like 109 holes and only 4 had really great mineralisation, there were a lot of duds, which you seem to be not understanding.
(20min delay)