thanks, yes id missed the historic wells + interpreted gas comments. if the logs are showing gas columns that roughly confirm to the maps spillpoint but it wasnt tested, that would go a long way toward proving trap risk. mention of the greater structural high is also positive. im sure they've done the work and it checks out.
i guess my initial concern was an overall lack of data. but historic well penetrations and untested gas zones is very encouraging. better than a few seismic lines or gravity blobs. thanks, im already much more confident
thanks, yes id missed the historic wells + interpreted gas...
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.5¢ |
Change
-0.001(9.09%) |
Mkt cap ! $13.47M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.5¢ | 0.6¢ | 0.5¢ | $45.15K | 9.007M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 514861 | 0.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.6¢ | 3604481 | 9 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.25pm 27/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| BNL (ASX) Chart |