Funny screenshot.
Potential for a starter mine at Stibium? Without a single hole drilled? Though could make sense to push this agenda if pushing for grants. Unless there was truly some high confidence things there, like a huge visible vein. But can Antimony realistically be a quicker path? ("earlier cashflows") Would antimony not need PFS at least, meaning measured/indicated? Maybe debt funding needs >PFS, but possibly government grants can go with less.
Though a 'grant' could be considered 'earlier cashflows'. Getting some money in advance of construction, not after production ramp-up like gold.
PFS - demands measured/indicated. North Uphill might be easy pickings for that - being open and consistent intersections, but only having enough density for inferred & indicated yet. Valley even more so (needing upgrading), likely being inferred.
Surprise for me - mention of Stoney but not Shoeshine. I thought Shoeshine would have priority, with greater leverage on an RPM area PFS.
Stibium takes a front seat (first in the targets list). Highest potential target? I'm not so sure. But most valuable in the short term? Maybe, if it can lead to grants.
Funny screenshot.Potential for a starter mine at Stibium?...
Add NVA (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
29.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $62.82M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 29.5¢ | 31.5¢ | 28.5¢ | $18.29K | 61.32K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 646 | 28.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 29.5¢ | 83046 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 26/04/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
|
Last
29.5¢ |
Change
0.000 ( 0.20 %) |
||||
| Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
| 31.0¢ | 31.0¢ | 29.5¢ | 4066 | ||
| Last updated 15.22pm 26/04/2024 ? | |||||
| NVA (ASX) Chart |