Nit picking. Why cut out the part about criticism that explains...

Nit picking. Why cut out the part about criticism that explains this snippet? It's all well and good to criticise someone for running slow, ignoring they qualified for the race despite you yourself are unable to even compete at that level. What merit has those criticisms even have without citing evidence, not bothering to leave the couch and a bunch of stitched up internet searches to back dubious claims?

Clearly, Taurisk was looking for a response from me over multiple posts and tagging. All I did was simply give it. Like it or not.

What is an irrelevant rave is your attempt to invalidate my response when you're not even in the conversation. Neither do you offer any information of value. Just backing illegitimate claims to somehow make other thinks it's not just coming from one and may be true, when it's not.

Let's start with, what does jefferies2 actually like and think positive about the company that gets you following, shall we? Before you go on with your usual trolling. Cheers