In answer to your question on cost, I have no idea. My point was that multiplex tests of the type mentioned do exist and I did state that cost of equipment could be a major factor in location of POC and I guess in cost as well. I think that history has shown that being able to test for viruses without dependency on machine readers is advantageous, at least in practical aspects if not in accuracy. Since I last posted I noticed this link. I can't say I have digested all the details but it looks like a "RAT like" multiplex test.
https://touchaustralia.com.au/pages/combo-rat-covid
On the question of accuracy I believe that this site
https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.44.2100441?emailalert=true
was used to launch into the lack of accuracy of approved RAT tests. Maybe this was warranted but it seemed strange that no acknowledgment was ever made of the fact that some at least matched Anteo reported results!
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- ADO
- Ann: European RAT Clinical Trial Halted to Refocus Initiatives
Ann: European RAT Clinical Trial Halted to Refocus Initiatives, page-193
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add ADO (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
2.1¢ |
Change
0.001(5.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $51.84M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
2.0¢ | 2.1¢ | 1.9¢ | $24.34K | 1.215M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 6000 | 2.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
2.1¢ | 1080621 | 4 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 6000 | 0.020 |
4 | 1580000 | 0.019 |
16 | 1271612 | 0.018 |
5 | 807891 | 0.017 |
5 | 1728529 | 0.016 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.021 | 1080621 | 4 |
0.022 | 255000 | 2 |
0.024 | 531781 | 3 |
0.025 | 406936 | 5 |
0.026 | 45454 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 16/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
ADO (ASX) Chart |