For anyone who hasn't seen pegmatite RC drilling before, the orange arrow is the pegmatite, the red arrow is the ultramafics/mafics.
Average hole was 40-60m deep so they're probably doing rows of 20 x 1m samples here (read like a book, start at top left, read right, go to next line, each sample is 1m). So we know the pegmatite interval is at least from roughly meters 2m-7m, but it doesn't continue as deep as the 22m interval (blue arrow). We can assume this hole is 64m deep. You don't get 5 geologists standing around chip spoils with cameras if there isn't something exciting there.
More surface hand samples of spodumene.
Pegmatite from roughly 21m through to 33m (14m interval*), into a mafic(?) contact. This might align with their surface observations of 25m width.
UV fluorescence is a nice indicator of
potential spodumene (orange). It's not definitive but with the surface hosting spodumene, this looks all about wrapped up. Yellow fluorescence could be scapolite(?) - not of economic interest.
Hard to say what this is conclusively but it would have to be spodumene dominant with the grin on his face.
It also might be more shallower-dipping than I thought, which again I come to the same conclusion from post
64722207 that we need lithium rights for the tenement to the east.
No mention of working with the 3rd parties who provided the interest in the lithium prospectivity. But if they're talking about DSO and potentially running a resource estimate, they must be confident they're
potentially sitting on 5Mt:
(15m [pegmatite width] X 200m [estimate width to tenement boundary] x 600m [known strike] x 2.7 ) = 4.86Mt
(20min delay)