the event of interest in the sampling is so high, 96 vs 22, the population would be quite opposite, we will have rare event issues instead, I'd like to know how they split the training and testing samples, if they use training sample to do the testing, it makes sense that specificity and sensitivity result look so good
the event of interest in the sampling is so high, 96 vs 22, the...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 150 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add IIQ (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
56.0¢ |
Change
-0.010(1.75%) |
Mkt cap ! $59.09M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 57.0¢ | 57.0¢ | 54.0¢ | $96.73K | 176.3K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | 55.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 56.0¢ | 7999 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 28/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| IIQ (ASX) Chart |