I have to agree. The tenement acquisition from a director is...

I have to agree. The tenement acquisition from a director is what seemed to signal the fall in SP. Things started to quickly unravel from there, along with the discrepancy in numbers from Pittong.

From the company's perspective, I don't understand why this acquisition was even needed at the time - whether it was a Director's tenement or not. SUV have enough on the go already without having to deal with this as well.

And why the rush? Why not wait until you have at least one local project going before stretching the company's time and money with yet another tenement.