Ann: Exercise of Options and Investment by Directors, page-38

Well isn't it a good thing the SP isn't 5c then ( sarcasm intended )..... would have been ~1000% increase for the oppies.

You could have said something along the line of P210's comment on 'timing'.... and fair enough P210.
But damned if you do.... damned if you don't.
9/4 expiry.... if taken days before could have been seen similarly.

But you 2ic went straight for the jugular...... unhappy holiday.... didn't like the $15 Bali tax....
Why did DT not take up his full entitlement?.... who knows.... $157,000 is a lot of money.
That's his business.... and good luck to him..... maybe he simply couldn't afford it.
Doesn't matter how cheap anything is.... if you can't afford it..... economics 101.

Now for the really interesting bits..... the surreptitious innuendo.

"Can't blame selling to reduce exposure risk"..... I will call that..... gaslighting.

And again... "Like I said, can't blame him for taking the opportunity to cashout and not just because of the risk"..... more gaslighting.

The master of innuendo.

I do agree with the Hotel California analogy..... however, there are always exceptions.

You sir are a muckraker of the highest order..... you are also a hypocrite.... now playing the man.
Good god..... we'd still be reading your essay if the SP was 10c..... maybe he'd have taken his full entitlement and ran for the hills.
Management still have ~ $6.6M invested here and if the drills hit high grade gold over the next mth or so, with the POG as it is.... you sir.... will be out of a job.