Exactly - if that is a response by a director of CHK then it makes no sense. Maybe that director had better pick up the phone and speak to any commercial assay lab about the modest price of some whole-rock geochemical analysis for this "highly unusual and has never been encountered in the entire Stuart Shelf" that was intersected by HWDD_02.
Or they could have cut some petrology thin section samples and got a contract Petrologist opinion on the mineralization seeing as they were already sending samples from other drill holes for petrology study anyway. Why ignore sulphide mineralisation that they already have in the core yard?
Ann: Exploration and Development Update, page-62
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 78 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add ALR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $12.88M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.3¢ | 0.3¢ | 0.3¢ | $2.4K | 799.9K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2483821 | 0.3¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.4¢ | 8139101 | 15 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 10.41am 15/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| ALR (ASX) Chart |