I don’t think this hole targeted the path of the AMT...

I don’t think this hole targeted the path of the AMT interpolated between the 2 lines so it’s not surprising the result wasn’t exciting. I still think they should drill to the bottom of the AMT near hole 1, the sulphides may be at the base of the AMT anomaly and may be the source of the hole 1 sulphides, very typical for magmatic sulphide deposit model. Not sure the new location of hole 4 is optimal as it is even further away from the hole 1 sulphides and the AMT. The proposed hole hole 5 also doesn’t appear to target the AMT conductor. I really want to find out what is at the base of the AMT near hole 1 so I hope they drill it at some stage as I think that’s the most likely location for massive sulphides such as chalcopyrite and pentlandite to accumulate. there might be nothing there but I’d really like to find out. Anyway I think the management team is great and I spoke to them at the AGM so really good team to hopefully hone in on minerals if they are there.