FWIW here is my interpretation on things as it stands to date....

FWIW here is my interpretation on things as it stands to date.
1. I dont see the use of ANT geophysics as an indication that drilling where we have surface outcrops is failing to find any signficant spod zones. We need to know if there any blind pegmatites as well as those whose location is defined by surface outcrops. My only issue is why its taken so long to decide to use ANT. This could have been initiated at the same time we started drilling.

2. The absence of commentary in the announcement today on drilling observations, whilst it would have been nice to get some indications, is not in itself a negative. Looks like we have to wait for lab assays for these. But having said that the company does have an on-site LIBS instrument so have an approximate idea of drill results however there may likely be reluctance to share that info ( given not wanting to be over-reliant on LIBS accuracy) and would rather wait for confirmatory lab assays. What we are left to speculate on is what conclusions we can draw from that extremely positive commentary in the recent videos,( especially the one at the Steak place) given at the time they would already have indicative data from the LIBS on-site assays.