I don't think there is any perceived criticism of the current...

I don't think there is any perceived criticism of the current board / MD newcomers , their competence or indeed their character or motivations , at least not from this poster.

However , there is a deep concern by many (and rightly so imo) as to how a project could get to the stage that it did with (what is now reported in the AGM Presentation) such glaring deficiencies across so many Critical Path areas/items of the schedule. Any one or two of them should have flagged a high or extreme risk in any risk analysis.

The combination of them all was obviously the perfect storm for a "show stopper".

Full points to the current MD and board for finally enlightening us to the previous "high risk" deficiencies that existed in the original program critical path . As also mentioned I look forward to the current MD and board addressing these issues in a conventional methodical manner with all appropriate checks and balances in order to get the LGP off the ground.

My opinion only , so DYOR.