Yes I agree amigo. As you have said, why stop RC#8 when the...

Yes I agree amigo. As you have said, why stop RC#8 when the drill is in the sulphide (at 140m down hole)? But I'm accepting there was probably a good reason. During lockdown, I've been trying to interpret the results. I've used the GPS coords to overlay the plan view from the first announcement of RC1, RC2 onto the plan view of RC8-RC11. It is very interesting, but am sorry that I can't master the skill of posting the combined image on HotCopper. Nevertheless we can use a diagram from March 29021.

A cross section would show RC8-11 cut the Quarry lode about 50m to 100 m shallower than RC1-2. Below is a section from the announcement of 4th March 2021 - it shows RC2, and we could imagine RC9 would be cutting the "marble with sulfide stringers" at a shallower depth. The assays of RC2 (and RC1) showed that the higher grades of gold and base metals were in the "massive sulfides". Now RC8 is the northern most drilling of the extension of the Quarry Lode and its intersection of the sulphides is significantly larger (about 75m) than the other RC holes (about 40 to 50m for RC2). Also RC8 seems to show the sulphide lens is vearing to the northwest. Yes, we'll have to wait for the assays, but this sulphide lens of Quarry Lode is looking like it could grow and substantially add to the JORC-compliant resource. Also, because it begins at shallow depth, it could be the openpit start-up mine that GRL needs. All just guesswork at this stage.