I agree that 30m+ is unlikely in the first holes but disagree that just an indication of mineralisation would be a positive. Historical exploration has done the hard yards and narrowed down the target to this 600m. If the model holds true as a look a like of Lisheen they have this 600m to prove up it thickens towards the major fault and that's it. I'd be happy with 10m+ from the first hole and then an indication in the second it is continuing to substantially thicken.
I agree that 30m+ is unlikely in the first holes but disagree...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
