Again, you are wrong. I am a holder. If you cannot even read the...

First 22 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Born2run

936 Posts.

256

14/09/23

19:06

Post #: 69863341
Share

Originally posted by ezirida: ↑

unless challenged in a court of law, we will never know the truth

fact is, under alternative transactions, the T/O certainly meets the 'criteria' yet in OZL version of the contingent payment deed, there are allegedly exclusions that are not published in the version of the contingent payment deed provided by CPN

fact is, in this case, CPN and OZL should have allegedly made it clear to the market, way way way before I was even speculating about it, by definatively ruling out, the triggering of the contingent payment deed

as a non holder I am surprised you have such an interest, maybe it's that massive chip on your shoulder about trying to prove me wrong

if I took the matter to court with unlimited funds and a decent couple of lawyers, I bet you I could make CPN $20M.. or alternatively I could start class action regarding disclosure obligations of directors, for allegedly both CPN and OZL

the reality is, that no one had the balls, the funds, or the 'F### you' attitude that characterises real tigers in the exploration game

keep wasting your valuable energy posting on stocks you don't own

Expand

Again, you are wrong. I am a holder. If you cannot even read the basic disclosure at the bottom of each post, surely you have no hope to read (or rather, understand) the details of a takeover transaction.

CPN Price at posting: 18.0¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
1 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply