I believe this company is non-economic because they have to remove 5 meters of overburden to get to maybe 2 grams a ton of gold-bearing material. But they haven't a serious mill so they only get about 1.5 gpt after gravity feed with their dinky toy. it's OK while the shareholders are paying for it, it's sustainable for them . This set-up would only be economic with reef high-grade gold & the Gekko was never appropriate for a publically listed company as it doesn't have scale & is only suitable for small-scale private mining
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Extension of Security Purchase Plan
CLZ
classic minerals ltd
Add to My Watchlist
0.00%
!
0.1¢

I believe this company is non-economic because they have to...
Featured News
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
|
|||||
Last
0.1¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $2.790M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
CLZ (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable