if CATH backed out, China would have much more leverage with AVZ not being able to show a clear path to development. Being a chinese company they could be influenced to do this.
The fact they dont leads me to believe this is non-state actors as AVZ says repeatedly. Therefore Zinjin is alone and i have no doubt that ICC will kick them off the register, thereby leaving only AVZ and Comminere to develop this.
It will also undo Comminere's sale of 20% to MCCS and Zinjin, leaving the DRC with 25% that they can play with. It appears 15% of this is for AVZ first rights of refusal but i expect if DRC kept the full 25% that wouldnt be the worse partner to keep
What was the outcome of ICC and MCCS? we heard MCCS did not win, but i wonder where the announcement is? How long does ICC take post judgement to enforce this?.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AVZ
- Ann: Extension of TIA End Date to 30 June 2023
Ann: Extension of TIA End Date to 30 June 2023, page-12
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 26 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AVZ (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online