I have been pondering for some time why Zinjin have acted how...

I have been pondering for some time why Zinjin have acted how they have.
Is this all just a strategic play by zinjin to aquire more of avz in a sp dip? They know that the likely outcome of their actions will be
1. Claims overturned.
2. Delay in project progressing
3. Negative sentiment on sp in short to medium term.

How do these outcomes benefit zinjin when they own about 6% of AVZ?
3. Do they intend on buying in the dip knowing long term the harm to the sp will correct?
2. Adjusting project timeline is to their benifit?
1. Claim was never meant to be upheld and was used as a strategy to support points 2 and 3.

Just my thoughts.