From my work, I got a Total of approx 150.9Mt at around 1.23% Li2O from known areas TA1 to TA3 that have drill coverage
My estimated Volumes and grades are as follows:
TA1:AP011 & 010: 31million cu metres = 83.1Mt @ 1.45% Li2O
AP012 Upper: 1.8 million cu metres = 4.92Mt @ 1.25% Li2O
AP012 Lower: 2.5 million cu metres = 6.81Mt @ 1.31% Li2O
TA2AP015: 0.2 million cu metres = 0.5Mt @ 1.41% Li2O
AP016: 1 million cu metres = 2.7Mt @ 1.82% Li2O
AP017: I haven't seen any numbers yet
TA3:AP01: 0.37 million cu metres = 1.0Mt @ 1.2% Li2O
AP02: 2.0 million cu metres = 5.42Mt @ 1.20% Li2O
AP03 & 04 : 16.2 million cu metres = 43.4Mt @ 1.25% Li2O
AP05: 1.12 million cu metres = 3.0Mt @ 1.22% Li20
AP06: too small to bother with at the moment
Looks like my volumes for AP03 and AP04 are in the same ballpark as
@WowVeryJosh calculations and would be interested to see if his volumes for the other mineralized Pegs AP01 to AP016 are very different from mine. I kept AP04 & 05 separate from AP01 & 02 even though they are possibly the same original Peg unit just because I was already set up to treat them as separate volumes. Similarly for AP012 Upper and AP012 lower just for ease of importing and keeping data consistent. The visual estimate intervals without assay results I have just assumed the Spod mineralized material reported will average at 1.2% Li2O, admittedly some may be lower and some higher but seems to be the trend of this years drilling.
I was using an SG of 2.68 so my numbers may vary from his a bit as well. All the grades tend to converge around the 1.20% to 1.25% Li2O area with the notable exception of AP010 & 011 and AP015 & 016 which are higher grades. This would be a function of the cut-off grades selected for reporting drill interval lengths so unsurprising they would all converge around this area if the same person was using the same selection criteria for reporting assay length intervals.
