Ann: Extensive New Zone of Shallow Gold Discovered - Roe Hills, page-29

Explain why these figures are correct and I'll write a retraction. At this stage I'd rate these figures as completely irrational overestimates. If you can't back up your assertions, please refrain from making remarks like this.

No decent intercepts yet, no understanding of the mineralisation, orientations, strike, depths or grades. Barely any drill holes in the ground. No metallurgy, no resources, no scoping studies, no FS. Yet somehow you've pulled a 3moz furphy from who knows where.

I know I'm wasting my time speaking reason on here, but coming from someone who works in the industry, sometimes the comments on here by armchair experts are so deadset embarrassing I feel as though I need to comment to prevent the off chance an inexperienced investor might read your comments and believe them