I think that would be because Buffett's already stinking rich....

I think that would be because Buffett's already stinking rich. He's also called for higher taxes on the rich. Also this is going way off topic, surely.

The point you're avoiding is that nobody is without error.

Not you, not me and not Buffett. Not self-styled posters who think they're experts.

Anyone can lose perspective. Anyone!

The issue is the relevant facts. Instead of having a lynch mob it's best to try to disentangle what went wrong and make logical inferences.

The insults that have been flying about WP, and the Board in general are a bit much.

Thank goodness commonsense prevailed on the vote and supposed spill. Otherwise I'd rate our chances of this thing flying as close to zero.

And we've still got a long way to go. I'm reassured with the latest anns.

On the topic of consistency. Another speculative company I hold has had a poorly performing Board, but on balance I still supported them. There are issues, serious issues around what's happened in the past but those involved are no longer on the Board, or don't have senior positions. Mistakes were made in that the lynch mobs then proceeded to remove the people who were part of the solution. But that's my opinion!

I don't like lynch mobs because you better be VERY SURE of your facts. I once called for removal of a high profile Chairman, and he opted to resign (I'm not saying my own call was the cause!). The logic and inferences from facts behind that were overwhelming. IMO.

Calm and restraint enable clear thinking to prevail.

Did anyone go to the AGM and does anyone want to make a report? TIA.