Gday R42,
i would believe that the technical report that was just released would not have been in the scheme book. So i would expect them not to be similar. i do not believe anyone knew the Sunday mines have grades of ,36% and this will not be in the booklet. i believe this because the scheme has been submitted to the court and the court said more forward. Then the technical report was released.
i wonder what cut off grade was used in the Adkins report? All i know is ,36% is excellent and much higher than other uranium companies in America, other than the Breccia Pipes. But i did see the confirmation that there is a toll mill agreement, just as i thought. Someone on this forum said i was wrong because it was not announced via a separate release. But since it is not material it never needed to be released.
over all, WU looks like it is shaping up nicely as a near term producer. Now if the ablation machine were to work, those ,36% grades would look positively Athabascan!
Cait
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- BLR
- Ann: Federal Court Orders Convening of the Scheme Meeting
Ann: Federal Court Orders Convening of the Scheme Meeting, page-10
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 19 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add BLR (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
CC9
CHARIOT CORPORATION LTD
MD - Shanthar Pathmanathan, Geologist - David Trabert
MD - Shanthar Pathmanathan
Geologist - David Trabert
SPONSORED BY The Market Online