Good Morning all, Can we start focusing on FGR future rather...

Good Morning all,

Can we start focusing on FGR future rather than FGR's past?

We all know the failures of the 2019 BE target, we are all pointing the finger at WG, which may or may not be the right person.
I suspect, WG was relaying the message from the executive directors. Previously WG was a strong supporter of the executives, its pretty clear to me that Craig didn't want to leave, instead he was pushed out the door then decided to sell all of his shares on market.

Every shareholder will be able to vote at the upcoming AGM. I am pretty sure WG knows full well how pi$$ed off his shareholders are, banging on about it on HC is now only impacting our investment, just look at SPN who now have a higher MC than us, all they have is a few university IP's, no customers or method to produce graphene. We are years ahead of SPN .

WG has appointed Mike, who has quickly worked out FGR commercialisation issues where he has appointed a team of sales experts that are driving the company in the right direction. In under 12 months, we have gone from a company that was only looking at selling graphene poweder, to a company who is working directly with industry and masterbatch companies on developing masterbatches and products that will drive the graphene sales.

You only need to listen to Mikes video, he advised the sales team have told FGR the initial plan to work directly with the concrete industry won't work, we need to move to the additive companies and cement suppliers. Mike and the board have now gone directly to these companies to develop the IP. We are now only 3-6 months away from hearing the results of these new developments where it would require 420k tpa of graphene (if successful). We only need a faction of this market to be successful, which shouldn't be hard when every concrete manufacture is looking for lower carbon options.