“The Fifield termination will almost certainly be reversed and damages paid - I've explained why.”
This is a massive statement, it would be good to hear more details on this. Your other post said it was technically correct to cancel it (based on technicality specifically), but was also based on ridiculous arguments?
What are the public sources for this please?
“The Fifield termination will almost certainly be reversed and...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 103 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
