Share
1,622 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 319
clock Created with Sketch. 25/11/20
13:46
Share
Originally posted by dolcevita:
↑
Yes plenty make cryptic observations and don't explain themselves.at the outer edge of the mineralisation , and we are slowly moving from this towards the source and going downdip, while encountering massive sulphide mineralisation ALL the time.of course the direction and extent of the mineralisation is going to be less consistent.IF we were drilling near the centre of the mineralisation, then ok maybe they've got a point. Maybe. use your commonsense and keep things in perspective. experts on nickel exploration. It's why they didn't start drilling in the centre, they're going systematically from the edges inwards, and I assume (using my commonsense, it's so they don't have to go back again), they're busily defining the resource , they are getting the shape of it and extent of it. They're not haphazardly drilling and coming up with dusters.
Expand
one could argue that it’s good business to work from the outside in, based on sector wide confidence of increasing nickel demand for sustained share growth leading to less dilution for mining finance. Thereby minimising the orphan period etc...
