Depth? 99.9% of everyone on this forum is out of there depth...

Depth? 99.9% of everyone on this forum is out of there depth reading that rubbish. 90% of it is written to confuse.

Lots of words, lost of stats, before @neometals reaches the main point, "Your main comment has been that there are no met results from the phase 1 open pit area at CV5 (west end of CV5). That is a fair comment, there aren’t met results from there yet. However, the current met results reasonably suggest that there should be no difference in metallurgy at the west end of CV5, on strike with CV13. Heck, you can go look at the core photos and see that spodumene grain sizes are similar from the west end of CV5".

I dont give an F what picks look like, or "reasonably suggests". Its been 14months since met test, its been 10months since the technical report was completed, it was October before the technical was uploaded to Sedar, convienently after ALB took a position. it was November 2023 when PMT submitted its mining document to the Government about these phases, and grades for each. That document was not submitted to Sedar or to the ASX.

@Bill town Depth? That technical report outlined further testing was required, including adding host rock to samples. Other companies that you both raise have done that to the area that will be mined initially. This is not about them, its about PMT.

Depth? lets keep going BILL - The west end of Cv5 has high Fe levels, 1.20%, why? does this continue or is it a one off, heck i guess cause its looks like cv13 its "all good"... Nah, because we dont know the actual details of Cv13 because PMT has not released anything other than, "Its good, like cv5, and can do DMS". Crap.

@neometals
@Bill town impress me. What is the mpta for 800klt sc5.5 that PMT keep harping on about.