Ann: Final Assays & Structural Report Confirm Mawson Discovery, page-42

Yes Nova was a MLEM conductor but also a booming DHEM conductor as you'd expect. DHEM would generally take precedent over MLEM though, as the sensor is closer to the source, less affected by conductive cover, and the station spacing is denser hence a higher resolution. They drilled the D5 conductor with RKDD005 and explained it as multiple graphite±pyrrhotite bands in metasediment (Ann 19-11-19). Again, I don't recall them saying if the DHEM on this hole indicated additional off-hole conductors outside of this intersection. Best case is DHEM detects a conductor lying close to D5 that wouldn't be resolved by the more coarse-spaced stations of the MLEM survey.

I see the results from the DHEM on these latest diamond holes as being highly significant to Mawson's prospectivity so very interested on when/if they'll be released, even if they are negative.

Bas.