I understand all that @goldbear77 I did not buy into BML for...

I understand all that @goldbear77 I did not buy into BML for long term historic average prices. I am here for the once in a generation seismic shift upwards in Ag and the long overdue supercycle in commodities generally. That is my view. It may not be the view of others and I might be proven wrong. I can live with that. For those that do have the same view it is good to see the horizon of possibilities.

For me the PFS pricing assumptions of historical long term average are a big yawn. It's not why I am here.

Here is the chart using the historic long term average prices for completeness. These need to be discount for risk based on the fact that we are yet to start mining. As noted above IMO the figures for the 2M or 2.25 M tonne mine are now most relevant that is $2.55 and $2.93 per share.