Hello marcus A, I do not usually respond to baiting posts like...

Hello marcus A, I do not usually respond to baiting posts like yours and I challenge you politely to show one single post of mine where I had a go at anybody except 2iC.
Stump up and prove your claim with several examples as you seem to indicate that is my style. He was a special case. The now banned poster apparently breached legal limits in his posts against Dean.
Your claim is: "plenty of vitriol for anybody who dare question the gospel according to Dean Tuck" Where is the vitriol?

I only had a go at 2iC because of how he posted; and the company must have had words - or HCopper sought legal advice and found they had to ban 2iC. So perhaps I was justified going back at his abrasive and otherwise ****** manner and slant on things. Why are you stirring that up now? 2iC had some valid points about the scale of discoveries (yet in early stages) and I did seek alternate views from other geologists apart from Dean who had access to far more data than the rest of us. That is why I challenged him; in the end at full tilt because he played the man.

This is a boring "play the man" post of yours that fails to offer any opinion or analysis about DRE or the prospects. I could report it but would rather let it stand for viewers to judge for themselves. I stand by your right to say it though. I wont be drawn in to this sort of discussion normally as it is pointless.

I think readers in here on balance can read my post above and understand I was saying:
"Hi all, this is a brilliant presentation IMO. Stream seds, soil work and fault structures with historic information all tied together giving us an "inside" look at why they are enthusiastic to explore this vast area."

See "presentation" not anything else and I stand by that. I then warned nature is fickle but offered hope that the lightly drilled nature and wide occurrence of gold indicate potential. No claim of a viable deposit or discovery as that work is yet to be done. I fully admit I am a glass half full sort of a guy. Not generally negative.

Good luck to you. I have no strong opinion about you but was tempted to point out the obvious. I apologize to readers for joining this poster off topic.
Sorry, I will stick to DRE discussion and results or helpful answers that people in here seem to appreciate - and I appreciate that.

Cheers CW