I am hoping that their "net sale price of the customer’s products" can not include a subsidiary of Renesas Electronics America or their parent company. If a subsidiary can be defined as a customer under the contract then actual profits could be partitioned off, thus reducing royalties Renesas has to pay. The parent company incurs most of the costs and the subsidiary makes most of the profit. Movie distributors pull this trick all the time.
Ann: First Akida IP License Agreement, page-454
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 329 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add BRN (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
21.0¢ |
Change
-0.005(2.33%) |
Mkt cap ! $399.0M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 21.5¢ | 21.5¢ | 21.0¢ | $168.7K | 794.1K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 67 | 1363045 | 21.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 21.5¢ | 1267393 | 44 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 13.10pm 20/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| BRN (ASX) Chart |