I don't get many of the posts on here. Management appear to be taking a scientific approach to exploration to discover the next Tier 1 asset which is likely to be at depth.
They did just that with Achilles, using nearby data from AGC to redesign and prioritise the drilling program. Every logical junior explorer would have done just that. There were no promises made, no fluff. Just a methodological approach to finding the next Tier 1 mineralisation.
They clearly scaled back the drill program when visuals were not promising, saving costs. I am sure they will move onto the next logical risk-return play in their portfolio. It's a hold for me.
Ann: First Assays Returned from Achilles 1, page-29
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.7¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $4.697M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.7¢ | 0.7¢ | 0.7¢ | $28.15K | 4.021M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | 4185000 | 0.6¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.7¢ | 1654161 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 12.08pm 13/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SER (ASX) Chart |