There really shouldn't be any excuse why an exploration company...

There really shouldn't be any excuse why an exploration company cannot put out an interpretation to the market, especially considering they are diamond drilling, and include some cross-sections.

• Interpreted dip: very steep or near vertical
• Open east and west; but not at depth
• The north-facing section shows the pegmatite is open to the east beneath where outcrop does not exist at surface
• Holes 1, 2 and 3 are the western-most holes which intersect the main-dyke and shows the pegmatite is open to the west
• Hole 3 (east facing section, or deepest hole on the left of the north facing section) shows the pegmatite is drastically thinning at depth (logged previously as 1.17m of muscovite pegmatite)
• Grade smearing across waste zones and outside of previously logged pegmatites
• Hole 1 logged spodumene pegmatite from 20.28m to 38.53m (18.25m); assays claim Li2O intervals from 19.7m to 40m (20.3m), an extra 2.05m from thin air
• Drillhole 14 - the last of a sequentially numbered drill program, after the apparent trend of the pegmatite would be able to be inferred from the previous 13 holes, is drilled at -45/104° when the pegmatite is known to strike east/west (90°). The top-down shows just how blatantly they've drilled across the pegmatite in hole 14.

Below model is based upon east/west strike, near-vertical dip and is the main pegmatite body with an additional bifurcation (not shown) on the footwall:



TOP-DOWN:


LOOKING NORTH:


LOOKING EAST:


LOOKING WEST: