there are so many mathmatical and factual errors in the numbers...

there are so many mathmatical and factual errors in the numbers that it's not funny...reminds me of some of the early reporting of drilling at tambourah.
once again we see a style that is consistent with early announcements, the person who signed the announcement is again consistent... rita brooks, the only constant at tmb.

still the exploration manager as the competent person is signing off on the data, i dont think that competent person is thoroughly checking the announcement.

i could see the old cracks reappearing in the reporting when in the previous quarterly when someone wrote that tambourah had....
"potential for hemi style intrusion related gold mineralisation", as if "intrusions" were all that was required to draw a comparison.

the person who wrote that knows bugger all about geology, and is expecting their audience to know even less.