I refer to a recent poster's comments directed at Granny.
I quote:-
"tone back the OTTrhetoric"
"unrealistic andoverzealous"
"uneducated investors "
"unnecessary losses."
"stick to the facts"
"temper the hyperbole"
Definition of rhetoric as perOxford Dictionary:-
language designed to have a persuasive orimpressive effect, but which is often regarded as lacking in sincerity ormeaningful content.
Granny is certainly persuasive.He provides great insight to this space and granted he is certainly impressivelycolourful in his delivery but what a fun read!
Is he meaningful ? Do yourown research and see if you agree, then you will know if he's meaningful.
Does he lack sincerity? Ithoroughly enjoy and look forward to his comments. If you don’t ,then simply placehim on ignore.
Is he unrealistic??? In whatway? Please enlighten us. All I can see is a great company going places .Announcements will become very "oh just another announcement", ohjust another 10% gain"!!
Is he overzealous??? I lovehis approach. Certainly overzealous with Kit Walker but who can blame him!
"Uneducatedinvestors" My my, aren’t you the lucky one that god gave all the brains toand we're all a bunch of f*w@@ts who are too dumb to know how to invest.
What'syour investment advisory business called again???
Ah yes ,its called FIGJAM,f#ck I'm good just ask me!
Does he stick to the facts?You got me on this one PJ so please expand. Where has he been blowing smoke upyour arse? Please do tell.
I'm with you Buzz and lookfoward to Granny's insights .
