Ann: Fluence Investor Presentation, page-95

Umm....just about everything you have just said is validation that the reasons why India is not a current priority has little to do with “corruption”. Which is my sole point. The company has shown that it is prepared to pursue opportunities in “more corrupt” countries or countries that represent smaller market opportunities. So the criteria is obviously something else. As a shareholder, I am comfortable with the decision to prioritise China and USA given the scale and immediacy of these opportunities. However, as a shareholder, I am also concerned about company executives allegedly going on record to use “corruption” as the reason to ‘back burner’ a huge market, when they clearly are happy to invest in a number of countries that are regarded as equally or more corrupt. It sends a message that not only is India not of interest today, but likely ever.

Appreciate the offer of audio presentation. Lazarus65here at gmail.com. Many thanks in advance.