The chart really throws everything a bit out of perspective with them showing how much more active they are when they pump it well outside of thresholds 4,3,2,1 but the only relevance there really is in lab experiments ?
Most CPP's need really large doses to be active which rules them out commercially where PYC clearly beats rivals when they up the thresholds. but then when you get back to 0.5
µM - they seem to come behind 3 of the conventional CPP's. Also interesting that with the advancement from Gen 1 to Gen 2 sure they become more active the more you pump them up but then less active back to 0.5 uM ?
Really to make that chart more accurate visually to what matters they should run another chart that compares all CPP's at 0.5uM ?
The arrows are just what appears (very difficult with the chart) to be the best results at 0.5uM
PYC Price at posting:
2.9¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)