Just has a closer look at the firm representing the client: portfolio law
It looks a little 'dennis denuto'-ish, so I agree this may not be the big one. By that comment I mean small/out of their league, rather than any reference to a common Italian theme
They are also trying one on Myer even though a similar case was dismissed as abuse of process by a judge:
http://www.smh.com.au/business/reta...r-class-action-dismissed-20161230-gtk00f.html
It could also be a good sign in that the big law firms and litigation funders don't think there is enough evidence to risk their dollars funding it. IMF, SGH have a lot of experience in these matters and won't risk funding low probability cases.
So based on the above, I am not too concerned. DYOR.
I really appreciate Dazza and the ASX sending out this announcement one day earlier than scheduled at 10:05am. It took me 10 minutes to read and absorb the announcement by which time SRX trading had opened. What's the point of a TD if they then don't allow anyone to read through the subsequent announcement? The ASX really need to get their act together in this area. Similar issues occurred recently with BAL announcements.
