Your first sentence is rather naive. My comment about the meaning of your sentence stands. I am perfectly happy to defend it in court.
As for the deletion of chand's comment, you seem to have difficulty in reading the plain meaning of an English sentence. My comment about the woke busy body does not refer to the moderators; as we are all aware, the moderators only act upon a complaint by one of the readers. It is unhelpful to have such restrictions placed on comments. My comment stated that chand's comment was as valid as yours. It does not state that all Chinese are guilty of fraud.
As we are all aware, there are different Chinese elements in our community, some are spies, some are fraudulent and some are honest. The Australian Govt is dealing with the fraudulent ones now and this PET company suffered due to fraud by the Chinese element. It is not racist to state the facts.
Meanwhile, the sp is bouncing without a known reason other than speculation so far.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Full Year 2022 Result Commentary
Your first sentence is rather naive. My comment about the...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add PET (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
2.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $15.60M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
PET (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable