well IMO the point was to confirm that the discussions regarding potential closure for finance are closer than it may have appeared. No doubt also a way to shore up the SP but why would that be an issue?. Plenty of non-holders have had their say about this issue and were all cockahoop for the wrong reasons but this ANN is putting the previous ANN in perspective IMO.
as for site visit - that's a huge step in getting your beloved Nacchu on the go. Potential investors obviously want to see the layout of the "land" as well as the SEZ as that all forms part of it - I know I would want a site visit to see what I was going to potentially invest in especially when talking large sums of $$$. J/V terms (assuming one of the investors takes this up) will be interesting - but of most interest is what parties are looking at Nacchu - are they also interested in offtakes?. as we are getting to the pointy end IMO quality G stock will be pursued.
MNS Price at posting:
32.0¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Held
(20min delay)