I agree with all of those statements and it paints a good...

I agree with all of those statements and it paints a good summary of events.

As for Landowner support, I think they (KNSI) need all land owners support and it would appear that is not the case for the few that formed this company after reneging from any deal with Axiom. (That allowed KNSI to deal with other companies (Carpetbaggers) that offered the world.ie: no benefit to LH's that are evident IMO) It was at this time the documents were sent to the Mines Committee for consideration. The subsequent issue is that they were false and misleading, including the full page adverts. Whilst I understand there are a few LH's that may not be on board, they are now faced with possible legal procedures which may ultimately be determined by the courts. I don't think it as clear as a fast submission, and a ruling against a LOI and then awarding a licence at the same time...that is not procedure!

So yes, it would appear that the proof is there, but it does not make sense and IMO caught the company by surprise, so I cannot agree that any intention was deliberate to deceive SH's. If illegal dealings were carried out under Solomon Islands Processes then these will show, as they are already red flagging these particular circumstances. That's why Tenement D and San Jorge need to get started and demonstrate its sustainability and benefit.

As far as adding up, I have to agree, in all of these circumstances, it doesn't add up. Hence the reason I believe Ryan Mount has that ability to understand these circumstances. I'm pulling out my hair every step of this drama, but I still remain positive, Axiom is still here and with China and USA trading situation, it may have a good flow on for demand of our product!


GLTA