You don't need to hold a stock to understand a stock or provide...

You don't need to hold a stock to understand a stock or provide an informative argument against owning it. Just the same that you don't need to understand how to raise, slaughter and butcher a cow to judge the quality of a steak. The reality is there are plenty of facts of the matter that define this company and stock whether or not you or anyone else wants to admit it.

Stupid comment from you. Reality is the only people I see here posting any sort of quantitative arguments or even non-emotional critiques of the broader narrative surrounding MFG are non-holders and sellers. 95% of posts from holders here essentially just boil down to calling people meanies for not liking their stock.

If anything, holding the stock creates emotional involvement that non-holders aren't biased by.

Doubly stupid comment from you.