The potential for scale is there with these clays, the results support what MW said in the Crux interview, could easily drill it out to 100mt.
We await the met work... A part of me wishes they drilled their hard rock targets first, you either have good drill results under your belt or you dont with hard rock, as well as the objective chances of finding an ionic deposit being low. People seem to forget they have primary hard rock targets, so could see poor met work being used against them. But hey that's the pessimistic outlook - There are a couple promising signs the met work could be solid.
Plus, the met work will be after Ti Tree assays so it may be over-shadowed by those or at the very least provide a "all brother make dip buy".
In the Crux interview recorded on the 7th MW stated "We should have the metallurgical results in the next at least four weeks" , I think the testing they are preparing an announcement for is the 'size by assay' not the leech testing. Any REE heads can comment on the significance of 'size by assay' work?
VSR Price at posting:
10.5¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
