Incorrect look at the drill hole locations and figures and do a...

Incorrect look at the drill hole locations and figures and do a side by side comparison between both the previous and current Anns.

Drill Hole FZ-DDH-004 is correct in the current recently released Ann as corelates with the correct hole number / location etc. However in the previous Ann the drill hole which was labelled on Map view as FZ-DDH-004 "60 meteres of saprolite clay" is was incorrectly labelled previously and should be labelled FZ-DDH-005 (which aligns with also with previous Ann Figure 2 Section)
My point being that drill hole FZ-DDH-004 which is shown and has results referenced in the current Ann is a totaly different Drill Hole altogether to the incorrectly labelled drill hole FZ-DDH-004 in the previous Ann.

This makes a huge difference as this means that the results for the 60m intercepted saprolite clay has not yet been released and is still pending ro come through with the remaining drill hole results.

Also means that in the current location in the current Ann that is a very good deep intercept in the recent current correct location which again is a totally different drill hole altogether from the previous Ann.

Yes is abit confusing but go back through and check what I'm saying thoroughly and conpare locations of both holes and figure sections to see what im talking about. Its a significant difference IMO.
See below for reference: