Yes good value and especially for the downside to upside risk....

Yes good value and especially for the downside to upside risk. Short term downside (around 50%) buffered by the cash backing, and short term upside (around 150%) if they manage to get the deal over the line and start drilling. I don't see access per se as the problem otherwise they would've already walked away from the deal. I'm speculating that access is no longer an issue because with love they have made the locals happy. I think they now need some protection under the deal to mitigate against the risk of the locals suddenly becoming unhappy (and needing more love to make them happy again). In other words, I think they want the vendor on the hook for some clawback (skin in the game so to speak) which I see more as prudent rather than a hindrance to the deal. What is inexcusable though, is leaving the market uninformed yesterday morning. You don't treat your shareholders and potential investors like that. You don't disrespect us. The company needs to lift its game in this regard. My preference is for that new CTM chap to be more influential.