We all said they should have secured the funds from an...

We all said they should have secured the funds from an institution that would have kept them honest and motivated to pay it back instead of all the crazy overheads this company has that your hero benefits from. They were incentivised over the past few years to drag their feet IMO.

"according to the downrampers on here, none of them would lend the company a cent". What is wrong with you? Why would anyone here in their right mind lend them a cent so they can continue to pay themselves for doing nothing, pay bizzles other company for exuberant rent for an office that remains empty most of the time and a tolling company that SB owns to drive the ore halfway across the country at very little profit to anyone but him IMO. Have you overleveraged into this and its clouding your judgement of what's right and wrong or are you set on convincing unsuspecting investors that this company has no flaws and has always had investors best interests at heart?