The BPAM Management fee is 1.2% of Portfolio Value, covering the cost of the senior management team. That isn't the major long term problem for shareholders. And given the mess this hasn't been a money earner for BPAM - but that is of their own doing.
The performance fee is the bigger issue - 17.5% of Market Cap for 100% outperformance of TSR versus AO Accum Index. Whilst this is subject to clawback, if the good times ever come, 17.5% of the market cap of the company will be given away as FPO shares or performance Rights to BPAM.
All of this was disclosed in the prospectus but in my humble opinion it is a very poor governance model.
From all accounts they've got a good CEO but given the issues above it is un-investable IMO.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Further Update on Capital Management Considerations
The BPAM Management fee is 1.2% of Portfolio Value, covering the...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
TG1
TechGen Metals kicks off airborne geophys survey at Sally Downs copper play – a first for the permit
KAI
Pilbara Minerals buys land off Kairos part of its York gold project for $20M – and a 2% royalty on any PLS gold sales
Add BFC (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $5.991M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
BFC (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable