Spoke to Jason and well, mmmm. my summary is "NOT HAPPY JAN"
The 60% to Phua was calculated using the soar labs valuation of BP when it received the 49% shares.
I personally and professionally don't think that passes the pub test. The valuation of the 49% of the shares should, IMO, be based on the value of the company today not ages ago. That would then mean that Phua would get a lower distribution because the value of the company today is, well, 4-6 times profit plus a little (very little) goodwill.
If you guys believe that I should do some more maths into this, then I will. if you are happy to let it go, then I won't. Personally, I'd like to because I don't like the way the directors are bleeding this company.
Please note that if I continue on this, a major re-distribution will be required which will then need to be passed onto ASIC to investigate.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- BPG
- Ann: Further Update on Soar Labs settlement
Ann: Further Update on Soar Labs settlement, page-16
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 23 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add BPG (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
FHE
FRONTIER ENERGY LIMITED
Adam Kiley, CEO
Adam Kiley
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online