Anton, assume you refer to GCY as the 3rd Hub, not MGV. Correct?
In theory if GCY is taken over by RMS, that wpuld be a 3rd mill/hub.
The argument for RMS not to have a tilt at GCY, would be the mill is too close and in some respects will compete against RMS' Mt Magnet operation.
However at the right price, why not nab it - provided RMS is not buying a massive liability. A lot of money has been flushed down the toilet with GCY historically. I havent follwed GCY for a while. Things can change.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: FY23 Guidance achieved with $42.6M quarterly free cash flow
Anton, assume you refer to GCY as the 3rd Hub, not MGV....
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 25 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
IGO
IGO kicks off earn-in copper drilling on-site Encounter's Yeneena play as it adopts new identity
LKE
Lake Resources implies news article on job cuts made up; non-core sales "not material" and no rule 15.7 breach
Add RMS (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
$1.89 |
Change
-0.045(2.33%) |
Mkt cap ! $2.162B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$1.94 | $1.94 | $1.88 | $7.821M | 4.113M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
5 | 89751 | $1.89 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$1.91 | 14263 | 3 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
5 | 89751 | 1.885 |
4 | 35344 | 1.880 |
2 | 23014 | 1.875 |
4 | 16068 | 1.870 |
1 | 3014 | 1.865 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
1.905 | 14263 | 3 |
1.910 | 12332 | 2 |
1.915 | 61216 | 5 |
1.920 | 20270 | 2 |
1.925 | 3014 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 26/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
RMS (ASX) Chart |